The first of several British investigations into the e-mails leaked from one of the world's leading climate research centers has largely vindicated the scientists involved.
The House of Commons' Science and Technology Committee said they had seen no evidence to support charges that the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit or its director, Phil Jones, had tampered with data or perverted the peer review process to exaggerate the threat of global warming — two of the most serious criticisms levied against the climatologist and his colleagues.
In their report released Wednesday, the committee said that, as far as it was able to ascertain, "the scientific reputation of Professor Jones and CRU remains intact," adding that nothing in the more than 1,000 stolen e-mails, or the controversy kicked up by their publication, challenged scientific consensus that "global warming is happening and that it is induced by human activity."
Inquiry: Climate data not manipulated
A key government agency is proposing to lessen the scope of environmental reviews for nuclear reactors,...
Super Typhoon Bavi is bringing intense winds to the remote U.S. territories of Guam and the...
Lake Powell, the US’s second-largest reservoir, threatens to plunge to unprecedentedly low levels this year after...
A “prolonged, dangerous heatwave” was sweeping across parts of the central and eastern United States on...
