New evidence has emerged in Congressional inquiries that throw more light on the extent to which early knowledge and approval of the abuse went to the highest levels. What does a country do when compelling evidence shows its leaders have authorised international crimes?
Buried away in this testimony lies the most dangerous material of all: evidence which may establish that abuses on detainees in Iraq in September 2003, in the period perhaps including the events at Abu Ghraib, were the result of decisions taken at the highest levels of the administration.
At the very least, the next US president must ensure the full facts are established. It will then be for others to decide what follows. But if the US doesn't get its own house in order and restore its reputation for the rule of law, others will surely step in.
A hot meal is hard to come by in the Gaza Strip, but a lunch for...
President Donald Trump's administration exceeded the scope of an 18th-century wartime law in using it to deport some...
Mohsen Mahdawi, a Palestinian green-card holder and Columbia University student who was detained for his activism,...
