Soldiers based at Fort Bliss in Texas joined a secretive group called ‘Dark Horse,’ which one member explained “was to support and defend the Constitution, and was designed to fight alongside the military if need be, if the government ‘goes corrupt.’”
Sounds intense, but is it criminally extreme? The answer, it turns out, is no.
As first reported Monday by CAAFlog, the military law blog, the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals last month confronted several related cases arising from the Dark Horse organization. Two enlisted men had been convicted of, among other charges, violating an Army order by belonging to an “extremist” organization.
Specialist Christopher L. Moyers and Pfc. David W. Oliver successfully challenged those convictions, as the Army appellate court concluded Dark Horse did not meet the definition of “extremist” as spelled out in Army regulations.
The group has had its militia-like moments, including special patches, ranks and uniforms.
A federal judge has ruled in favor of artificial intelligence company Anthropic in its legal battle...
Tennessee national guard members assigned to a federal anti-crime taskforce in Memphis fatally shot an armed...
At a virtual town hall meeting, Navy families who abruptly evacuated from Bahrain six months ago...
