A federal appeals court ruled in July that the Copyright Royalty Board, a panel of administrative judges who set the rate broadcasters pay for copyright licenses, was unconstitutional because of the way its panelists are appointed and the job protections they are given.
The ruling could impact the work of thousands of administrative judges dissecting the details of regulations at U.S. government agencies from the Federal Communications Commission to the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Such judges' hearings replace traditional trials when regulations are at issue. They hear more cases than the entire judicial branch combined, said Arti Rai, a professor at Duke University School of Law.
An attorney for the former Olympic canoeist who was charged with vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial reflecting...
Stephanie Grisham, the White House communications director during President Trump’s first term, filed a restraining order...
U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s clash with President Trump over the handling of the Reflecting Pool case...
A compromise between Todd Blanche and two Republican senators that potentially cleared the way for Blanche’s...
