Passage of the US-Iraq security pact under the terms both countries' leaders have advocated could violate the constitutions of both countries, specialists told a congressional subcommittee yesterday.
American constitutional law scholar Oona Hathaway said she believes the Constitution requires Congress to also approve the agreement. The Bush administration has labeled the pact a "status of forces agreement," which can be implemented without congressional approval.
But Hathaway said the US-Iraqi pact is more comprehensive than previous agreements because it allows US troops to engage in military operations and specifies timetables for military withdrawal.
"These are unprecedented in a standard status of forces agreement, have never been part of a standard status of forces agreement, and extend in my view far beyond what the president can do without obtaining congressional approval," said Hathaway, a professor at the University of California at Berkeley's School of Law.
TVNL Comment: So what? Has the Bush administration done ANYTHING that IS Constitutional?
On Sunday, March 1, a day after launching the war on Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin...
The United States is sending a 2,500-strong Marine expedionary force to the Middle East, a U.S....
US air defence systems and troops have been withdrawn from East Asia. Pleas for missile interceptors...
